Heck v. Humphrey (1994) · due process
Wrongful conviction investigations
Reinvestigation of old cases: recanting witnesses, undisclosed evidence, and the misconduct that produced the conviction.
Under Heck v. Humphrey (1994), a person generally cannot bring a Section 1983 claim that would call a conviction into question until the conviction has been overturned. Wrongful conviction work therefore has two stages: the reinvestigation that helps to overturn the conviction, and the investigation of the misconduct that caused it.
What an investigation looks for
- Trial witnesses located and re-interviewed, sometimes decades later
- Alibi and alternative-suspect evidence that was never developed
- Police and prosecution files searched for undisclosed material
- The history of the officers and analysts who built the original case
How these cases are investigated
In wrongful conviction cases, the work most often involves independent case review, witness location and interviews, officer and agency background research, and public records requests. What a particular case needs depends on what evidence already exists and what is at risk of being lost.
Nationwide, and civil rights only
Evidence in wrongful conviction cases is lost quickly. Video is overwritten, records are purged, and witnesses move on. Civil Rights PI accepts these investigations nationwide, and the earlier the work begins, the more there is to find.
How it is investigated
Services these cases rely on
Witness Location & Interviews
Finding the people who saw what happened, including those the official report left out, and recording what they know while they still remember it.
Learn morePublic Records & Document Requests
Incident reports, use-of-force reports, dispatch records, policies, training files, and jail logs, obtained through public records laws and organized for the case.
Learn moreOfficer & Agency Background Research
Prior lawsuits, complaints, discipline, certification history, and employment history for the officers and agencies involved.
Learn moreIndependent Case Review & Reinvestigation
A second, independent look at the official investigation: what was done, what was left undone, and where the report and the evidence disagree.
Learn moreMore case types